Cultural non-participation is largely a "label" created by research that focuses too narrowly on highbrow, state-subsidized culture, rather than the everyday activities people actually enjoy, such as gardening or socializing.
If you're interested in diving deeper, I can provide details on:
The study is based on qualitative interviews with 40 people in Finland whose backgrounds predicted low cultural activity. Understanding Cultural Non-Participation in an ...
Understanding Cultural Non-Participation in an Egalitarian Context (2022) by Riie Heikkilä explores why individuals in high-equality societies (specifically Finland) abstain from "highbrow" cultural activities, such as theater, opera, or museum visits. The book challenges the notion that these individuals are completely passive, revealing they often have active, alternative lifestyles.
Despite the study's focus on an "egalitarian" setting, the research shows that lower education and being outside the labor market still predict lower participation in traditional highbrow culture, maintaining social stratification. Cultural non-participation is largely a "label" created by
(social-mundane, cultural-legitimate, introvert-hostile). How this study defines "highbrow" vs. "everyday" culture.
Individuals deemed "passive" are often actively engaged in informal, everyday culture, though this rarely replaces highbrow consumption in social hierarchy terms. The book challenges the notion that these individuals
Viewing cultural participation as unnecessary or impractical. Resistance: Actively resisting the highbrow cultural canon.