Torture and Brutality in Medieval Literature - Boydell and Brewer
: Highlights the English prohibition against interrogatory torture. Tracy analyzes works like Havelok the Dane and Chaucer’s Prioress's Tale to show how Englishness was defined by rejecting "foreign" brutality.
The book asserts that medieval authors used torture as an to negotiate cultural anxieties. By portraying brutal practices as something done only by the barbarian "Other" —such as pagans, foreigners, or tyrants—authors defined their own nations as civilized and just in opposition to that cruelty. Key Themes & Chapter Summaries
Detail the specific Tracy argues were later "mythologized" as medieval (like the Iron Maiden)
Tracy posits that medieval literature often condemned torture as the mark of a tyrant rather than an accepted part of the legal system. The prevalence of torture in fiction functioned as satire, critique, and dissent against the status quo. If you'd like to explore this further, I can:
Provide a list of the she uses as case studies
In (2012), Larissa Tracy challenges the popular myth that the Middle Ages were a time of sadistic and unprovoked torment . Her central argument is that literary depictions of torture were not mirrors of actual historical practice but were instead complex rhetorical tools used to critique authority and define national boundaries. Core Argument: Torture as "Othering"
: Explores how identity was shaped by resisting the rod, emphasizing the alterity of those who practiced judicial brutality.